Jan. 5, 2026

Why Investing Feels Risky to Most People (and Why It Usually Isn’t)

Why Investing Feels Risky to Most People (and Why It Usually Isn’t)

Why does investing feel so risky to most people—even when history shows otherwise? In this episode, we break down the psychological and structural reasons investing triggers fear, uncertainty, and hesitation for so many individuals. From market...

Why does investing feel so risky to most people—even when history shows otherwise?
In this episode, we break down the psychological and structural reasons investing triggers fear, uncertainty, and hesitation for so many individuals. From market volatility and media headlines to loss aversion and short-term thinking, we explore why investing feels dangerous—even when long-term data suggests it usually isn’t.
This is not about stock tips or predictions. Instead, the episode focuses on how risk is commonly misunderstood, how time changes the nature of investment risk, and why doing nothing often carries its own hidden costs.
Whether you’re new to investing or simply skeptical, this conversation reframes risk in a clearer, more practical way—helping you separate emotional reactions from reality.
In this episode:
  • Why volatility feels scarier than it actually is
  • The difference between short-term risk and long-term risk
  • How human psychology distorts investment decisions
  • Why “playing it safe” can quietly erode financial progress

Educational and informational only. No hype. No predictions. Just a clearer way to think about investing and risk.
WEBVTT

1
00:00:02.040 --> 00:00:04.879
This is smart money explained, where finance is broken down

2
00:00:04.960 --> 00:00:10.480
clearly without hype, opinions or predictions. Today we are wrestling

3
00:00:10.560 --> 00:00:13.880
with a monster, one that's you know, completely psychological, yet

4
00:00:13.919 --> 00:00:17.839
it controls trillions of dollars around the world. I'm talking

5
00:00:17.879 --> 00:00:22.760
about that pervasive, that really deep seated fear that investing

6
00:00:22.800 --> 00:00:26.359
in the stock market is just it's too risky, it's

7
00:00:26.359 --> 00:00:29.800
too hard, or frankly, it's just glorified gambling.

8
00:00:29.480 --> 00:00:33.679
Right, And for millions of people, that belief is this powerful,

9
00:00:33.880 --> 00:00:37.479
invisible barrier. It stops them from participating in what is,

10
00:00:37.920 --> 00:00:40.719
you know, historically one of the greatest wealth creation engines ever.

11
00:00:40.840 --> 00:00:45.200
And that fear, that that hesitation, it's maybe the single

12
00:00:45.280 --> 00:00:48.359
greatest obstacle to building wealth for the average person.

13
00:00:48.439 --> 00:00:50.799
Oh absolutely, We're not just talking about a minor hurdle here.

14
00:00:50.799 --> 00:00:54.119
We're talking about a deep, instinctual avoidance of potential loss.

15
00:00:54.759 --> 00:00:56.719
So our mission today is to take this stack of

16
00:00:56.759 --> 00:00:57.799
sources you've pulled together.

17
00:00:57.880 --> 00:00:59.039
Yeah, we've got everything we do.

18
00:00:59.119 --> 00:01:01.840
We're covering everything from like ancient human evolution and brain

19
00:01:01.920 --> 00:01:05.079
function all the way to quantitative studies on merger rumors

20
00:01:05.120 --> 00:01:07.079
and investor timing. And we're going to use them to

21
00:01:07.159 --> 00:01:09.200
fundamentally challenge that ingrain fear.

22
00:01:09.560 --> 00:01:11.840
So the goal is to show that the perception of

23
00:01:11.959 --> 00:01:17.799
risk is well, it's often profoundly disconnected from the reality

24
00:01:17.840 --> 00:01:19.280
of long term market history.

25
00:01:19.400 --> 00:01:21.840
Exactly. We're basically going on a myth busting mission.

26
00:01:21.920 --> 00:01:24.879
Okay, I like that, a myth busting mission. We're going

27
00:01:24.879 --> 00:01:29.560
to expose the psychological traps and the media noise that

28
00:01:29.680 --> 00:01:34.319
makes investing feel dangerous when statistically speaking, the biggest financial

29
00:01:34.400 --> 00:01:37.159
risk for a lot of people is often well, it's

30
00:01:37.200 --> 00:01:37.920
not investing at.

31
00:01:37.840 --> 00:01:40.519
All, that's it, precisely. And I think the best place

32
00:01:40.519 --> 00:01:43.680
to start is by just dismantling the practical barriers people

33
00:01:43.719 --> 00:01:48.959
often bring up, because really, technologically and mechanically those excuses

34
00:01:49.000 --> 00:01:49.760
have just vanished.

35
00:01:49.840 --> 00:01:50.280
They're gone.

36
00:01:50.400 --> 00:01:54.319
They're gone. We've got sources from financial analysts Nasdaq's perspective

37
00:01:54.319 --> 00:01:58.000
included that confirm the mechanical barriers to entry are practically

38
00:01:58.079 --> 00:01:59.000
non existent today.

39
00:01:59.040 --> 00:02:01.920
All right, So let's tack the three biggest practical myths

40
00:02:02.000 --> 00:02:04.799
head on, because they still cling to the narrative, you know,

41
00:02:04.840 --> 00:02:07.560
like these stubborn barnacles, even though they've been completely debunked

42
00:02:07.599 --> 00:02:08.840
by the last decade of tech.

43
00:02:09.039 --> 00:02:09.800
Okay, Leimani.

44
00:02:10.039 --> 00:02:11.199
Myth number one is.

45
00:02:11.159 --> 00:02:11.800
The big one.

46
00:02:12.199 --> 00:02:17.639
It's the core emotional roadblock. Investing is too risky, right, And.

47
00:02:17.759 --> 00:02:20.560
While yes, all investments carry some degree of risk, we

48
00:02:20.639 --> 00:02:22.680
have to be really specific about what kind of risk

49
00:02:22.680 --> 00:02:25.879
we're talking about. The long term historical data, I mean

50
00:02:26.360 --> 00:02:30.199
it overwhelmingly favors stocks overwhelmingly when we look at something

51
00:02:30.199 --> 00:02:33.599
like the S and P five hundred, Historically it's provided

52
00:02:33.639 --> 00:02:38.879
these substantial positive returns, averaging around ten percent sometimes more

53
00:02:39.199 --> 00:02:41.479
per year over long rolling.

54
00:02:41.199 --> 00:02:44.240
Periods, which is incredible compared to say, just leaving your

55
00:02:44.240 --> 00:02:45.719
money in a savings account or.

56
00:02:45.680 --> 00:02:48.560
Bonds or cash. Yeah. The key insight that all the

57
00:02:48.599 --> 00:02:51.520
analysts stress is that risk isn't something you avoid entirely.

58
00:02:51.599 --> 00:02:54.879
That's impossible, something you actively manage. You reduce it with

59
00:02:54.960 --> 00:02:58.199
a diversified, well thought out strategy.

60
00:02:57.680 --> 00:03:00.520
Because ignoring the market entirely has its own a.

61
00:03:00.520 --> 00:03:03.439
Huge one, the risk of having your capital just eroded

62
00:03:03.479 --> 00:03:06.039
by inflation over time. That it is a guaranteed loss,

63
00:03:06.080 --> 00:03:07.080
just a slow motion.

64
00:03:06.960 --> 00:03:09.800
One slow motion capital loss. I like that, Okay. Myth

65
00:03:09.879 --> 00:03:12.319
number two used to be a very real hurdle, especially

66
00:03:12.319 --> 00:03:15.360
for younger people or anyone without a high income. It

67
00:03:15.439 --> 00:03:16.639
costs too much to start.

68
00:03:17.360 --> 00:03:20.560
I mean, I remember when a basic brokerage account it

69
00:03:20.639 --> 00:03:24.520
required a minimum deposit of like thousands of dollars, and

70
00:03:24.560 --> 00:03:27.479
then you were paying a hefty commission, maybe twenty thirty

71
00:03:27.520 --> 00:03:28.680
dollars for every single trait.

72
00:03:28.759 --> 00:03:32.479
Oh yeah, that absolutely screened out the average person. But

73
00:03:32.520 --> 00:03:36.680
that information is completely outdated. It's just it's essential that

74
00:03:36.719 --> 00:03:39.240
you understand how much that landscape has changed.

75
00:03:39.520 --> 00:03:40.919
So what's the reality today.

76
00:03:41.199 --> 00:03:46.000
The sources confirm that many major reputable brokerage firms now

77
00:03:46.120 --> 00:03:50.360
offer accounts with absolutely no minimum deposit requirements zero.

78
00:03:50.599 --> 00:03:53.560
So you can start with what, fifty dollars, ten dollars,

79
00:03:53.599 --> 00:03:55.840
whatever you have. You can start with the change in

80
00:03:55.840 --> 00:03:59.439
your pocket practically, and the change in trading costs is

81
00:04:00.039 --> 00:04:01.759
it's revolutionary.

82
00:04:01.199 --> 00:04:02.759
Zero commission trader exactly.

83
00:04:02.919 --> 00:04:05.759
It's eliminated that friction cost, making it feasible to invest

84
00:04:05.800 --> 00:04:09.240
small amounts without being penalized. But the real game changer,

85
00:04:09.520 --> 00:04:13.000
the thing that directly benefits people with small starting balances,

86
00:04:13.400 --> 00:04:15.159
is the invention of fractional shares.

87
00:04:15.560 --> 00:04:17.439
Explain that because I think a lot of people still

88
00:04:17.480 --> 00:04:19.319
don't quite get how powerful this is.

89
00:04:19.600 --> 00:04:22.120
It's a simple concept. It just means you don't have

90
00:04:22.160 --> 00:04:24.199
to buy an entire share of a company like Amazon

91
00:04:24.279 --> 00:04:28.000
or Google, which might cost hundreds or even thousands of dollars.

92
00:04:27.759 --> 00:04:30.360
Which is impossible for most people starting out right.

93
00:04:30.439 --> 00:04:33.160
Instead, you can buy one tenth of a share or

94
00:04:33.360 --> 00:04:35.519
one hundredth of the share for just a few dollars.

95
00:04:35.800 --> 00:04:39.839
This mechanism makes it possible to immediately build a globally

96
00:04:39.879 --> 00:04:45.720
diversified portfolio using ETFs with literally with pocket change. The

97
00:04:45.720 --> 00:04:49.079
financial plumbing has been completely overhauled for accessibility.

98
00:04:49.120 --> 00:04:51.319
Okay, so it's not too risky in the long term

99
00:04:51.319 --> 00:04:53.600
and it doesn't cost too much to start. That brings

100
00:04:53.680 --> 00:04:56.360
us to myth number three, which I still hear constantly.

101
00:04:57.199 --> 00:05:00.199
Investing is hard and time consuming. You have to be

102
00:05:00.560 --> 00:05:04.199
like a math genius or some kind of insider tycoon, right.

103
00:05:04.360 --> 00:05:08.120
And that belief fosters this idea that you can't succeed

104
00:05:08.199 --> 00:05:11.120
unless you're trying to beat the market to outsmart everyone.

105
00:05:10.759 --> 00:05:13.800
Else, which is not the goal, not at all.

106
00:05:13.959 --> 00:05:17.319
The irony is that the most successful evidence based strategy,

107
00:05:17.360 --> 00:05:20.279
the one that's proven over decades of data, is often

108
00:05:20.319 --> 00:05:23.839
the most passive, most simple strategy. There is low cost

109
00:05:23.879 --> 00:05:24.680
index investing.

110
00:05:24.800 --> 00:05:26.800
The set and forget approach exactly.

111
00:05:27.160 --> 00:05:31.439
Technology has made implementing this strategy incredibly efficient. So success

112
00:05:31.480 --> 00:05:35.519
isn't about complexity, It's about consistency. You set up automatic

113
00:05:35.519 --> 00:05:38.199
contributions to a global index fund and you just you

114
00:05:38.240 --> 00:05:41.199
stick to it. The difficulty isn't in the mechanics. Those

115
00:05:41.199 --> 00:05:43.680
are simple. It's in the discipline to stick with it

116
00:05:43.800 --> 00:05:46.360
when the world around you is screaming to do otherwise.

117
00:05:46.560 --> 00:05:49.720
Okay, so let's unpack this. Then, if the practical barriers

118
00:05:49.720 --> 00:05:53.519
are gone, it's not expensive, it's mechanically simple, and the

119
00:05:53.560 --> 00:05:57.000
long term odds are demonstrably in your favor, then why

120
00:05:57.079 --> 00:05:59.639
is this widespread fear so persistent?

121
00:05:59.800 --> 00:06:01.160
That's the real question, isn't it.

122
00:06:01.319 --> 00:06:05.319
Why do smart, rational people procrastinate or feel this intense

123
00:06:05.439 --> 00:06:08.720
jolt of anxiety like they're at a casino when they hit.

124
00:06:08.600 --> 00:06:09.240
The buy button?

125
00:06:09.480 --> 00:06:11.879
And that's the deeper question. The answer lies in this

126
00:06:11.959 --> 00:06:15.879
fundamental mismatch. Our human operating system is running on ancient hardware.

127
00:06:16.120 --> 00:06:18.800
As you said, investing is simple by low cost funds,

128
00:06:18.879 --> 00:06:22.519
hold them forever. Simple, But it is profoundly not easy

129
00:06:22.839 --> 00:06:26.199
because it requires immense self discipline, patience, and this ability

130
00:06:26.240 --> 00:06:29.079
to add contrary to your deepest, most primal instincts.

131
00:06:29.279 --> 00:06:31.519
Okay, So this is where we get into the psychology

132
00:06:31.519 --> 00:06:34.959
of it all. This is part one the evolutionary handicap

133
00:06:35.480 --> 00:06:37.959
why our brains fight rational investing.

134
00:06:38.240 --> 00:06:41.959
We have to acknowledge a really critical piece of anthropological

135
00:06:41.959 --> 00:06:46.480
context here. Our minds were optimized for a very, very

136
00:06:46.480 --> 00:06:50.920
different existence. For about two hundred thousand years, Homo sapiens

137
00:06:51.000 --> 00:06:55.199
lived on the prehistoric savannah, focused entirely on immediate day

138
00:06:55.240 --> 00:06:56.639
to day survival.

139
00:06:56.279 --> 00:06:58.839
Right finding food, not getting eaten exactly.

140
00:06:59.279 --> 00:07:02.959
Our emotional and cognitive programming developed to handle short term,

141
00:07:03.079 --> 00:07:04.360
high stakes threats.

142
00:07:04.240 --> 00:07:06.920
The famous fight or flight response. I mean that mechanism

143
00:07:07.000 --> 00:07:09.360
is an evolutionary miracle. It's what kept us alive when

144
00:07:09.360 --> 00:07:11.600
we saw a lion or had to make a lightning

145
00:07:11.639 --> 00:07:13.639
fast decision about you know, whether the rustling in the

146
00:07:13.639 --> 00:07:15.959
bushes was dinner or danger precisely.

147
00:07:16.240 --> 00:07:20.160
Now, fast forward to today, the financial system, stocks, bonds, derivatives.

148
00:07:20.279 --> 00:07:23.439
This is a highly complex modern invention. It's only existed

149
00:07:23.480 --> 00:07:25.560
in a recognizable form for a few centuries.

150
00:07:25.639 --> 00:07:28.759
A blink of an eye in evolutionary terms, a total blink.

151
00:07:29.160 --> 00:07:32.040
So we are asking our two hundred thousand year old

152
00:07:32.120 --> 00:07:37.240
brain software which prioritizes immediate threat avoidance, and immediate consumption

153
00:07:37.879 --> 00:07:41.360
to handle a financial environment that's optimized for decades long

154
00:07:41.439 --> 00:07:43.199
patients and intellectual reasoning.

155
00:07:43.399 --> 00:07:45.639
So there's a total mismatch, a complete mismatch.

156
00:07:45.759 --> 00:07:48.480
The very traits that ensured our survival on the savannah,

157
00:07:48.600 --> 00:07:52.879
quick emotional response, intense focus on immediate threats, a preference

158
00:07:52.920 --> 00:07:56.399
for immediate gratification. Those are the same traits that are

159
00:07:56.639 --> 00:07:58.839
actively counterproductive in modern finance.

160
00:07:59.079 --> 00:08:02.360
So when the market and we see that terrifying screen

161
00:08:02.480 --> 00:08:07.319
full of red numbers, our ancient brain is fundamentally misinterpreting

162
00:08:07.439 --> 00:08:07.959
the signal.

163
00:08:08.079 --> 00:08:10.079
It s he's a lion, It seeds a lion.

164
00:08:10.000 --> 00:08:13.399
Or a sudden catastrophic loss of a food source, even

165
00:08:13.439 --> 00:08:15.759
though what we're actually looking at is just a temporary

166
00:08:15.800 --> 00:08:17.480
price fluctuation on a spreadsheet.

167
00:08:17.600 --> 00:08:21.279
It triggers that same deep seated threat avoidance instinct. But

168
00:08:21.319 --> 00:08:24.279
the most powerful force working against us in finance is

169
00:08:24.319 --> 00:08:26.839
a psychological phenomenon called loss a version.

170
00:08:27.279 --> 00:08:29.879
Right, this is the core behavioral bias from the Nobel

171
00:08:29.920 --> 00:08:33.120
laureates Daniel Konnoman and Amos Tversky. Their work on this

172
00:08:33.320 --> 00:08:37.080
is just foundational. Absolutely, it's based on decades of research

173
00:08:37.240 --> 00:08:42.320
into decision making under uncertainty, and it's so so powerful.

174
00:08:42.440 --> 00:08:45.519
So let's quantify the impact. What did they conclude about

175
00:08:45.559 --> 00:08:48.679
the relative weight of gains versus losses on our psyche?

176
00:08:48.759 --> 00:08:51.960
They concluded that the pain of losing money is psychologically

177
00:08:51.960 --> 00:08:55.480
twice as powerful as the pleasure of gaining an equivalent amount.

178
00:08:55.960 --> 00:08:57.399
Twice as powerful.

179
00:08:57.519 --> 00:09:00.440
Wow. So to put that into real terms for you, Yeah,

180
00:09:00.600 --> 00:09:03.039
if you lose one thousand dollars in the market, the

181
00:09:03.120 --> 00:09:05.759
emotional damage you feel is equivalent to the joy you

182
00:09:05.799 --> 00:09:08.039
would feel from gaining two thousand dollars.

183
00:09:08.279 --> 00:09:10.399
You need twice the reward just to get back to

184
00:09:10.480 --> 00:09:12.279
neutral emotionally, just.

185
00:09:12.240 --> 00:09:15.120
To neutralize the pain of the loss. And this is

186
00:09:15.200 --> 00:09:19.519
rooted so deeply in prehistoric scarcity. Our ancestors just couldn't

187
00:09:19.519 --> 00:09:23.159
afford to lose resources, losing a hunting tool, losing a

188
00:09:23.200 --> 00:09:25.279
cash of preserved food. I mean, that could be a

189
00:09:25.320 --> 00:09:26.960
death sentence for the entire group.

190
00:09:27.080 --> 00:09:29.720
That makes perfect sense. Losing a resource was a guaranteed

191
00:09:29.759 --> 00:09:33.759
survival penalty, whereas gaining the equivalent amount was just a

192
00:09:33.759 --> 00:09:34.679
temporary benefit.

193
00:09:34.720 --> 00:09:36.519
It wasn't symmetrical, not at all.

194
00:09:37.039 --> 00:09:40.679
And that biological imperative translates directly into bear market panic.

195
00:09:40.759 --> 00:09:44.240
Right when you see your portfolio drop by ten percent

196
00:09:44.399 --> 00:09:49.480
during a correction, the emotional response is disproportionately huge. It

197
00:09:49.600 --> 00:09:53.360
far outweighs the rational understanding that markets usually recover, and.

198
00:09:53.320 --> 00:09:55.360
This is why loss of version leads to these really

199
00:09:55.440 --> 00:09:57.559
common destructive investor behaviors.

200
00:09:57.639 --> 00:10:01.639
Absolutely, during a market sell off a sudden the instinctual

201
00:10:01.679 --> 00:10:04.399
action is to flee the danger. Your brain is just

202
00:10:04.480 --> 00:10:06.360
trying to stop the pain, so it pushes you to

203
00:10:06.440 --> 00:10:10.000
sell to realize the loss and make the psychological damage stop.

204
00:10:10.120 --> 00:10:12.360
And the tragic irony is that this leads to emotional

205
00:10:12.399 --> 00:10:14.039
selling at the absolute worst.

206
00:10:13.840 --> 00:10:17.320
Time, at the exact wrong time, during peak panic, and

207
00:10:17.360 --> 00:10:20.519
that act of selling is what transforms a temporary on

208
00:10:20.639 --> 00:10:24.360
paper fluctuation into a permanent, irreversible capital loss.

209
00:10:24.519 --> 00:10:26.240
We see this played out in all the studies of

210
00:10:26.279 --> 00:10:29.360
investor activity during crises like a global financial crisis in

211
00:10:29.360 --> 00:10:32.080
two thousand and eight. People were actively pulling their money

212
00:10:32.080 --> 00:10:33.759
out of the market right at the bottom.

213
00:10:33.600 --> 00:10:37.399
Guaranteeing they would miss their recovery. But loss of version

214
00:10:37.480 --> 00:10:40.159
also works on the upside, doesn't it. It can cause

215
00:10:40.240 --> 00:10:43.279
us to sell our successful investments way too early.

216
00:10:43.120 --> 00:10:45.360
Right, It's the flip side of the same coin, the

217
00:10:45.480 --> 00:10:48.000
tendency to hold on to losers for too long and

218
00:10:48.039 --> 00:10:49.159
sell winners too soon.

219
00:10:49.360 --> 00:10:52.399
Exactly, you hold a losing stock because you want to

220
00:10:52.399 --> 00:10:56.720
avoid that painful realization of loss. You keep hoping, praying

221
00:10:56.720 --> 00:10:59.080
it will climb back up to break even, even if

222
00:10:59.080 --> 00:11:02.799
the underlying company is failing. And on the other hand, conversely,

223
00:11:02.840 --> 00:11:05.519
when a stock is successful, you sell it really quickly

224
00:11:05.600 --> 00:11:07.679
to lock in the gain and avoid the risk of

225
00:11:07.759 --> 00:11:11.159
losing that pleasure. You take your winnings and run, but

226
00:11:11.240 --> 00:11:15.039
you miss out on potentially massive future compounded growth.

227
00:11:15.559 --> 00:11:19.120
So in both cases, the instinct to manage immedia emotional

228
00:11:19.159 --> 00:11:23.600
pain completely overrides the rational analysis of long term value.

229
00:11:23.679 --> 00:11:27.200
It's a constant battle. And beyond just avoiding losses, our

230
00:11:27.279 --> 00:11:30.600
evolutionary programming seems really ill suited for the long game

231
00:11:30.639 --> 00:11:33.240
of accumulation, particularly saving for retirement.

232
00:11:33.559 --> 00:11:36.360
We are just inherently terrible at delaying gratification.

233
00:11:36.720 --> 00:11:40.600
We're awful at it. It's the intense struggle with delayed gratification,

234
00:11:40.759 --> 00:11:44.240
often called the present bias. If a reward is available

235
00:11:44.320 --> 00:11:47.600
right now, we will prioritize it over a much larger

236
00:11:47.759 --> 00:11:49.000
delayed reward.

237
00:11:48.720 --> 00:11:51.399
Because our ancestors didn't have pensions, or for one.

238
00:11:51.320 --> 00:11:55.480
Case, no, the concept of saving for some nebulous retirement

239
00:11:55.639 --> 00:12:00.440
decades away was completely irrelevant. We're wired to prioritize immediate consumption.

240
00:12:01.000 --> 00:12:03.879
If there are resources available now, we should use them now,

241
00:12:04.120 --> 00:12:06.440
because tomorrow might bring a famine or a predator.

242
00:12:06.600 --> 00:12:11.000
And that pressure is just amplified infinitely by modern consumerism.

243
00:12:11.080 --> 00:12:14.679
Every ad, every social media feed is designed to encourage

244
00:12:14.720 --> 00:12:17.639
immediate spending and immediate gratification.

245
00:12:17.279 --> 00:12:20.200
Precisely, and this is why, as our sources note, if

246
00:12:20.200 --> 00:12:23.480
investing is mechanically simple, spinning everything you have is even easier.

247
00:12:23.919 --> 00:12:27.279
They drew a brilliant analogy between investing in fitness. Working

248
00:12:27.320 --> 00:12:30.399
out is simple in concept, eat less, move more, but

249
00:12:30.480 --> 00:12:34.360
it's profoundly difficult in execution because of the required discipline

250
00:12:34.399 --> 00:12:35.440
and the delayed payoff.

251
00:12:35.519 --> 00:12:37.639
The psychological cost of showing up to the gym every

252
00:12:37.639 --> 00:12:39.679
single day when you're not going to see dramatic results

253
00:12:39.679 --> 00:12:41.559
for six months is immense.

254
00:12:41.960 --> 00:12:45.279
Investing is identical. The process of dollar cost averaging into

255
00:12:45.279 --> 00:12:49.240
an index fund is so simple mechanically, but the discipline

256
00:12:49.240 --> 00:12:52.000
required to maintain that during a ten year period of

257
00:12:52.039 --> 00:12:56.440
a flat market or worse, a deep recession that's where

258
00:12:56.519 --> 00:12:57.919
human psychology feels us.

259
00:12:58.080 --> 00:13:01.080
That lack of immediate rewardger's the present.

260
00:13:00.799 --> 00:13:03.720
Bias it does. It makes saving feel like a parnishment

261
00:13:03.960 --> 00:13:07.159
rather than an investment in your future self. It forces

262
00:13:07.200 --> 00:13:09.320
you to literally battle your own biology.

263
00:13:09.399 --> 00:13:12.399
And then there's the social element, where tribal creatures were

264
00:13:12.399 --> 00:13:14.840
hardwired to pay attention to what the people around us

265
00:13:14.840 --> 00:13:17.759
are doing and saying, how does that reliance on tribal

266
00:13:17.759 --> 00:13:21.120
communication translate into bad financial decisions?

267
00:13:21.279 --> 00:13:24.559
That's the reliance on gossip. In the anthropological sense, our

268
00:13:24.600 --> 00:13:28.000
survival depended on rapidly exchanging information, even if it was

269
00:13:28.080 --> 00:13:30.480
unreliable information with members of our tribe.

270
00:13:30.600 --> 00:13:32.960
Right, Hey, there's a predator over that hill, or I

271
00:13:33.080 --> 00:13:34.159
found barriers over.

272
00:13:34.000 --> 00:13:37.600
Here, exactly. And in the modern context, this translates into

273
00:13:37.720 --> 00:13:43.399
giving undue weight to casual advice, you know, hearsay from friends, family,

274
00:13:43.840 --> 00:13:46.960
or some self styled money guru on a forum, rather

275
00:13:47.000 --> 00:13:50.559
than relying on thorough research or a consistent strategic plan.

276
00:13:51.480 --> 00:13:54.639
We value the story, the narrative, and the emotional connection

277
00:13:54.759 --> 00:13:56.559
over the dry quantitative data.

278
00:13:56.919 --> 00:13:59.039
So the person who brags at the dinner table about

279
00:13:59.080 --> 00:14:00.639
their one stock that went ten x.

280
00:14:00.840 --> 00:14:03.879
But conveniently forgets to mention the three others they blew

281
00:14:03.960 --> 00:14:05.559
up trying to trade options right.

282
00:14:05.519 --> 00:14:08.279
That person suddenly becomes the expert in the tribe.

283
00:14:07.919 --> 00:14:12.039
Exactly, and that narrative feeds directly into another counterproductive trait,

284
00:14:12.320 --> 00:14:16.600
over confidence. Confidence might have helped our ancestors gain social standing,

285
00:14:17.039 --> 00:14:19.399
but in finance, it leads investors to believe they can

286
00:14:19.440 --> 00:14:23.679
easily outperform the professional market based on limited information or

287
00:14:23.720 --> 00:14:24.440
a gut feeling.

288
00:14:24.759 --> 00:14:26.919
The sources are really clear on this. Being successful at

289
00:14:26.919 --> 00:14:31.720
investing is generally based on patient, passive accumulation, low costs,

290
00:14:31.840 --> 00:14:34.600
a solid strategy, not gut feelings.

291
00:14:34.919 --> 00:14:37.600
Your intuition might save you from a lion, but it

292
00:14:37.639 --> 00:14:41.639
will not save you from a poorly constructed, actively traded portfolio.

293
00:14:42.159 --> 00:14:45.159
We are wired to seek attention to feel clever, and

294
00:14:45.200 --> 00:14:48.039
those psychological needs often lead us away from the simple,

295
00:14:48.159 --> 00:14:51.919
passive and frankly boring strategy that actually works best.

296
00:14:52.320 --> 00:14:54.960
Okay, so that's a pretty damning case against our own brains.

297
00:14:55.240 --> 00:14:57.639
It feels like we're set up to fail. The reason

298
00:14:57.759 --> 00:15:01.399
investing feels risky is primarily internal. It's our primal fear

299
00:15:01.480 --> 00:15:03.960
mechanisms misfiring in a modern context.

300
00:15:04.000 --> 00:15:04.840
That's the core of it.

301
00:15:05.120 --> 00:15:07.639
But we need to move beyond the emotion now and

302
00:15:07.720 --> 00:15:11.519
define what true financial risk actually means. Because that's the

303
00:15:11.519 --> 00:15:15.919
difference between temporary discomfort and permanent damage. We have to

304
00:15:15.960 --> 00:15:18.000
clarify what we are actually risking.

305
00:15:18.080 --> 00:15:21.360
This distinction is paramount. It is the single most important

306
00:15:21.399 --> 00:15:25.399
concept to grasp to overcome that evolutionary fear. Investors often

307
00:15:25.480 --> 00:15:28.919
lump two very different concepts together precisely because of loss

308
00:15:28.919 --> 00:15:29.360
of version.

309
00:15:29.600 --> 00:15:32.879
So this is part two reframing risk. Volatility is not

310
00:15:33.039 --> 00:15:34.159
capital loss.

311
00:15:34.159 --> 00:15:37.000
And we're going to rely on some insights provided by

312
00:15:37.000 --> 00:15:39.960
Dorset Wealth Management to really clarify this. There are two

313
00:15:40.240 --> 00:15:43.120
very different dangers at play here, the risk of losing

314
00:15:43.120 --> 00:15:45.000
your capital and price volatility.

315
00:15:45.159 --> 00:15:48.799
Okay, let's untack this core difference with surgical precision. What

316
00:15:49.000 --> 00:15:50.720
is the risk of losing capital?

317
00:15:51.000 --> 00:15:55.320
This refers to the permanent, irreversible reduction of your initial investment,

318
00:15:55.600 --> 00:15:59.279
your principle. This happens when an asset appreciates significantly and

319
00:15:59.360 --> 00:16:02.799
just fails to cover, often because the underlying thing, the

320
00:16:02.840 --> 00:16:06.879
company the investment vehicle, goes bankrupt or defaults, or just

321
00:16:07.039 --> 00:16:09.200
experiences a permanent structural decline.

322
00:16:09.279 --> 00:16:12.720
This is where diversification becomes so essential because if you're

323
00:16:12.759 --> 00:16:15.360
all in on one stock, the risk of that single

324
00:16:15.399 --> 00:16:19.080
company going and solvent is an idiosyncratic risk, a risk

325
00:16:19.279 --> 00:16:21.720
unique to that one asset, and that could lead to

326
00:16:21.720 --> 00:16:24.399
a one hundred percent permanent capital loss.

327
00:16:24.480 --> 00:16:28.879
Exactly, permanent capital loss is the plane never reaching its destination.

328
00:16:29.840 --> 00:16:32.360
Our sources use the two thousand and eight financial crisis

329
00:16:32.360 --> 00:16:36.600
as a classic example. Investors who had highly concentrated holdings

330
00:16:36.600 --> 00:16:42.360
in specific financial institutions. They experienced true permanent capital loss

331
00:16:42.639 --> 00:16:45.799
when those firms failed or were restructured into pennies on

332
00:16:45.840 --> 00:16:46.200
the dollar.

333
00:16:46.399 --> 00:16:48.960
That loss is irreversible without putting more money.

334
00:16:49.000 --> 00:16:52.159
In correct, you can't get it back now. In contrast,

335
00:16:52.600 --> 00:16:55.879
what exactly is price volatility because that's what we see

336
00:16:55.919 --> 00:16:57.039
every single day when.

337
00:16:56.879 --> 00:16:58.639
The market is open, right, the ups and downs.

338
00:16:58.759 --> 00:17:01.759
Volatility is just the temper very short term fluctuations in value.

339
00:17:01.799 --> 00:17:05.240
It is the natural, inevitable characteristic of how markets behave.

340
00:17:05.319 --> 00:17:09.039
It's driven by daily news, investor sentiment, geopolitical events, you

341
00:17:09.079 --> 00:17:09.960
know all of it.

342
00:17:10.079 --> 00:17:13.240
But the crucial difference is that volatility does not necessarily

343
00:17:13.279 --> 00:17:15.519
mean permanent loss of capital, not at all.

344
00:17:16.119 --> 00:17:19.680
Historically, the broader market typically corrects and resumes its upward

345
00:17:19.680 --> 00:17:21.000
trajectory over time.

346
00:17:21.200 --> 00:17:24.680
So volatility is the turbulence on the flight. It's uncomfortable,

347
00:17:24.720 --> 00:17:27.599
it's stressful, it might make you question your decision to

348
00:17:27.599 --> 00:17:31.000
get on the plane, but it's usually temporary. If the

349
00:17:31.039 --> 00:17:33.200
overall structure of the market is sound.

350
00:17:33.559 --> 00:17:36.240
That's a perfect metaphor for this context. And let's use

351
00:17:36.240 --> 00:17:38.960
a very recent example the start of the COVID nineteen

352
00:17:39.000 --> 00:17:43.640
pandemic in early twenty twenty. The Australian ASX two hundred index,

353
00:17:43.640 --> 00:17:47.160
for example, dropped nearly forty percent between February and March.

354
00:17:47.240 --> 00:17:49.599
I remember that it was terrifying to watch.

355
00:17:49.680 --> 00:17:53.480
It was immense, stomach churning volatility. It reflected maximum fear

356
00:17:53.480 --> 00:17:56.359
and uncertainty. However, by the end of that same year,

357
00:17:56.839 --> 00:17:59.359
the index had largely recovered to where it was before

358
00:17:59.359 --> 00:17:59.960
the pandemic.

359
00:18:00.119 --> 00:18:03.119
The recovery was so fast, but the psychological hurdle of

360
00:18:03.160 --> 00:18:04.519
that drop was massive.

361
00:18:04.680 --> 00:18:08.000
It was and this is the core lesson investors who

362
00:18:08.160 --> 00:18:11.599
sold during that sharp forty percent decline. They locked in

363
00:18:11.640 --> 00:18:14.519
a loss that was caused entirely by temporary volatility.

364
00:18:14.599 --> 00:18:16.279
They took the turbulence and they turned it into a

365
00:18:16.319 --> 00:18:17.400
permanent capital loss.

366
00:18:17.799 --> 00:18:21.440
They did, but those who maintained their discipline, diversified long

367
00:18:21.559 --> 00:18:25.960
term approach, who simply rode out the turbulence. They avoided

368
00:18:25.960 --> 00:18:28.839
that permanent loss and they benefited fully from the recovery.

369
00:18:29.839 --> 00:18:32.720
Their portfolio numbers looked terrifying on paper for a few months,

370
00:18:32.880 --> 00:18:36.240
very terrifying, but they never realized the loss. They never

371
00:18:36.240 --> 00:18:36.799
made it real.

372
00:18:37.240 --> 00:18:40.839
That is the crucial insight. The decision to sell during

373
00:18:40.920 --> 00:18:44.480
volatility is what transforms a temporary paper loss into a

374
00:18:44.559 --> 00:18:48.559
permanent financial mistake. The market itself didn't cause the permanent loss.

375
00:18:48.680 --> 00:18:52.160
The investor's emotional response driven by loss aversion.

376
00:18:52.039 --> 00:18:54.680
Did, and that realization leads us to the concept of

377
00:18:54.759 --> 00:18:58.720
risk capacity. This is your practical ability to withstand loss,

378
00:18:59.240 --> 00:19:03.119
and it's determined two main things your investment horizon, how

379
00:19:03.160 --> 00:19:05.880
long until you need the money, and your cash flow needs.

380
00:19:05.920 --> 00:19:08.000
So if you're twenty five years old with a steady

381
00:19:08.079 --> 00:19:10.920
job and a forty year horizon until retirement.

382
00:19:10.480 --> 00:19:13.039
Your capacity for loss is very high. You can comfortably

383
00:19:13.119 --> 00:19:15.839
ride out severe turbulence. But if you're sixty and you're

384
00:19:15.839 --> 00:19:18.680
planning to retire in eighteen months, your capacity is low,

385
00:19:18.920 --> 00:19:22.160
and your portfolio should reflect that lower tolerance by having

386
00:19:22.200 --> 00:19:24.279
fewer volatile assets, and.

387
00:19:24.240 --> 00:19:27.240
The investor needs to understand that they are basically being

388
00:19:27.279 --> 00:19:29.119
paid to endure that volatility.

389
00:19:29.200 --> 00:19:30.319
That's a great way to put it.

390
00:19:30.400 --> 00:19:33.200
Which brings us directly to the long term asset allocation

391
00:19:33.319 --> 00:19:36.200
data we have covering over a century from nineteen one

392
00:19:36.240 --> 00:19:39.920
to twenty twenty two. This really quantifies the relationship between

393
00:19:40.039 --> 00:19:42.119
volatility and long term returns.

394
00:19:42.279 --> 00:19:45.599
This data is so critical because it brilliantly illustrates that

395
00:19:45.839 --> 00:19:51.200
volatility is indeed the price of admission for potentially higher

396
00:19:51.240 --> 00:19:54.759
long term returns. If you want the higher historical average,

397
00:19:54.759 --> 00:19:57.680
you have to accept the wider range of possible outcomes,

398
00:19:57.720 --> 00:19:58.880
including the negative ones.

399
00:19:58.960 --> 00:20:01.920
Okay, let's compare two who extremes from that DMS data,

400
00:20:02.160 --> 00:20:06.160
the super conservative approach versus the aggressive one scenario one,

401
00:20:06.799 --> 00:20:08.720
the one hundred percent bond portfolio.

402
00:20:08.880 --> 00:20:12.519
One hundred percent global bond portfolio has the smallest range

403
00:20:12.519 --> 00:20:16.200
of annual returns, the lowest volatility. It sounds safe, It

404
00:20:16.240 --> 00:20:18.079
feels comfortable to that loss of Earth's brain.

405
00:20:18.200 --> 00:20:19.039
Well, what's the catch.

406
00:20:19.200 --> 00:20:21.720
The catch is the average annual return over that entire

407
00:20:21.799 --> 00:20:24.599
period was significantly lower, coming in at just four point

408
00:20:24.680 --> 00:20:28.359
seven percent. Its volatility profile is flat, but its growth

409
00:20:28.400 --> 00:20:31.680
potential is inherently limited. It often barely beats inflation.

410
00:20:32.000 --> 00:20:35.839
Okay, and scenario two the one hundred percent stock portfolio,

411
00:20:36.440 --> 00:20:37.519
the all in approach, the.

412
00:20:37.480 --> 00:20:41.640
One hundred percent global stock portfolio had a much much

413
00:20:41.759 --> 00:20:45.359
wider range of annual returns. It includes some very large

414
00:20:45.400 --> 00:20:48.279
negative swings years where the portfolio is down thirty percent

415
00:20:48.359 --> 00:20:50.559
or more so high volatility.

416
00:20:50.680 --> 00:20:51.880
But the reward, the.

417
00:20:51.799 --> 00:20:55.400
Reward for accepting that emotional roller coaster, is a significantly

418
00:20:55.480 --> 00:20:59.359
higher average annual return. Historically it hit eight point one percent.

419
00:20:59.480 --> 00:21:02.720
Wait a second, If the stock portfolio averages eight point

420
00:21:02.720 --> 00:21:06.319
one percent and the bond portfolio averages four point seven percent,

421
00:21:06.799 --> 00:21:10.319
why would any growth oriented person bother with bonds at all?

422
00:21:10.400 --> 00:21:12.240
I mean, isn't the choice and no brainer? Why do

423
00:21:12.279 --> 00:21:13.640
we even need diversification?

424
00:21:13.880 --> 00:21:15.839
That's a great question, and it's where the nuance comes in.

425
00:21:15.880 --> 00:21:18.319
You are absolutely correct that pure stocks offer the highest

426
00:21:18.359 --> 00:21:21.119
average return over one hundred years, but that eight point

427
00:21:21.160 --> 00:21:23.680
one percent return demanded that investors endure the worst year

428
00:21:23.680 --> 00:21:26.359
of the Great Depression, to world wars, the stagflation of

429
00:21:26.400 --> 00:21:28.400
the seventies, and the two thousand and eight GFC.

430
00:21:28.599 --> 00:21:30.519
So the path to that eight point one percent was

431
00:21:30.599 --> 00:21:33.680
highly uneven and psychologically exhausting completely.

432
00:21:33.960 --> 00:21:35.920
I mean, if a twenty five year old invested their

433
00:21:36.079 --> 00:21:38.880
entire life savings in nineteen twenty nine, they would have

434
00:21:38.960 --> 00:21:41.680
had to endure a decade or more of devastating losses.

435
00:21:42.400 --> 00:21:44.839
Most human beings simply cannot do that, especially if they

436
00:21:44.880 --> 00:21:46.720
might need some of that capital for an emergency.

437
00:21:46.880 --> 00:21:49.599
Right, life happens exactly, and that is.

438
00:21:49.599 --> 00:21:54.599
Why diversification is so crucial. A mixed portfolio, say fifty

439
00:21:54.640 --> 00:21:57.880
percent stocks and forty percent bonds, it delivers most of

440
00:21:57.920 --> 00:22:00.960
the high return potential of stocks, but the addition of

441
00:22:01.000 --> 00:22:03.480
bonds acts as a psychological.

442
00:22:02.799 --> 00:22:04.440
Buffer, like a shock absorber.

443
00:22:04.480 --> 00:22:07.799
A shock absorber exactly when stocks are crashing, bonds often

444
00:22:07.839 --> 00:22:11.079
hold steady or even increase in value. They provide ballast

445
00:22:11.160 --> 00:22:14.440
that reduces the overall portfolio volatility. So you accept a

446
00:22:14.480 --> 00:22:18.319
slightly lower average return in exchange for a significantly smoother,

447
00:22:18.519 --> 00:22:20.759
more psychologically survivable.

448
00:22:20.200 --> 00:22:22.640
Journey, which makes it easier to stick to the plan

449
00:22:22.799 --> 00:22:26.000
during those inevitable crashes. And that's what matters most for

450
00:22:26.079 --> 00:22:27.079
long term success.

451
00:22:27.319 --> 00:22:30.680
The volatility is the price of admission. Diversification is the

452
00:22:30.720 --> 00:22:32.799
seat belt that helps you survive the ride.

453
00:22:32.960 --> 00:22:33.519
I love that.

454
00:22:33.839 --> 00:22:37.400
Okay, so we've established that the market isn't inherently too risky,

455
00:22:37.960 --> 00:22:41.079
but that we are naturally scared of its volatility. Now

456
00:22:41.160 --> 00:22:43.599
let's look at how our attempts to manage this discomfort

457
00:22:43.680 --> 00:22:45.599
often backfire spectacularly.

458
00:22:45.920 --> 00:22:49.039
This is part three, the cost of waiting, and.

459
00:22:48.920 --> 00:22:51.839
We're going to debunk market timing and media hype. People

460
00:22:51.880 --> 00:22:54.559
try to solve the fear problem by waiting for the

461
00:22:54.559 --> 00:22:57.759
perfect time to invest or by over relying on external

462
00:22:57.839 --> 00:22:59.559
signals the media to guide them.

463
00:22:59.799 --> 00:23:02.880
This is where the quantitative research just proves that inaction

464
00:23:03.079 --> 00:23:06.160
and attempts at timing are far more destructive than almost

465
00:23:06.200 --> 00:23:09.279
any other mistaken investor can make. We have to detail

466
00:23:09.319 --> 00:23:10.079
the Schwab study.

467
00:23:10.160 --> 00:23:11.400
This one is fascinating.

468
00:23:11.559 --> 00:23:14.640
It models the performance of five hypothetical investors over a

469
00:23:14.680 --> 00:23:16.920
twenty year period from two thousand and five to twenty

470
00:23:16.960 --> 00:23:21.160
twenty four. This study removes emotion and it shows, purely

471
00:23:21.200 --> 00:23:24.559
based on data, the cost of various behaviors. Each investor

472
00:23:24.599 --> 00:23:26.680
gets two thousand dollars annually to invest.

473
00:23:26.920 --> 00:23:29.839
Okay, let's start with the theoretical maximum Peter perfect.

474
00:23:29.839 --> 00:23:35.240
Peter perfect had impossible skill, unicorn luck. He timed his

475
00:23:35.279 --> 00:23:39.119
two thousand dollars annual investment perfectly at the absolute lowest

476
00:23:39.160 --> 00:23:41.160
closing point of the S and P five hundred every

477
00:23:41.200 --> 00:23:44.720
single year for twenty years. He maximized his share count

478
00:23:44.759 --> 00:23:45.240
every time.

479
00:23:45.519 --> 00:23:48.119
So what was his final tally after two decades?

480
00:23:48.200 --> 00:23:51.599
Peter accumulated one hundred and eighty six thousand, seventy seven dollars.

481
00:23:53.119 --> 00:23:56.359
He is the ultimate theoretical benchmark. He's what we all wish.

482
00:23:56.240 --> 00:23:57.839
We could be but can never be.

483
00:23:58.240 --> 00:24:02.119
Okay, Next up the realistic goal Ashley Action. She's the

484
00:24:02.160 --> 00:24:05.799
investor we tell everyone to be consistent, immediate, passive.

485
00:24:06.000 --> 00:24:10.400
Ashley Action took the simple, consistent, immediately actionable approach. She

486
00:24:10.440 --> 00:24:12.599
invested her two thousand dollars on the first trading day

487
00:24:12.599 --> 00:24:14.720
of the year every year, regardless of the market level

488
00:24:14.799 --> 00:24:16.759
or the news headlines. Just automate and forget.

489
00:24:16.799 --> 00:24:17.480
And how did she do?

490
00:24:17.799 --> 00:24:20.440
She accumulated one hundred and seventy five hundred and fifty

491
00:24:20.440 --> 00:24:23.160
five dollars. Now think about that, the difference between Peter's

492
00:24:23.160 --> 00:24:27.079
mythical perfect timing and Ashley's realistic consistent action was only

493
00:24:27.119 --> 00:24:29.079
about fifteen thousand dollars over twenty years.

494
00:24:29.119 --> 00:24:31.920
That's about seven hundred dollars a year. That's a surprisingly

495
00:24:32.000 --> 00:24:32.759
small difference.

496
00:24:32.960 --> 00:24:36.799
It's tiny. The study found that across eighty separate twenty

497
00:24:36.880 --> 00:24:39.519
year periods going all the way back to nineteen twenty six,

498
00:24:40.200 --> 00:24:44.519
the rankings were almost always the same. Peter first, Ashley

499
00:24:45.079 --> 00:24:47.039
a very very close second.

500
00:24:47.160 --> 00:24:49.799
So trying to achieve perfection only gave a marginal game

501
00:24:49.880 --> 00:24:52.640
compared to just taking action consistently. But what about the

502
00:24:52.640 --> 00:24:55.079
investor whose timing was perpetually terrible.

503
00:24:55.279 --> 00:24:59.839
Ah, that is Rosie Rotten. She was the unluckiest investor possible.

504
00:25:00.160 --> 00:25:02.240
She invested her two thousand dollars each year at the

505
00:25:02.319 --> 00:25:05.119
absolute market peak, the highest closing level for the S

506
00:25:05.200 --> 00:25:06.480
and P five hundred, so.

507
00:25:06.359 --> 00:25:09.839
She suffered maximum regret every single time she invested, every

508
00:25:09.839 --> 00:25:10.440
single time.

509
00:25:10.559 --> 00:25:13.839
And yet even Rosie accumulated one hundred and fifty one thousand,

510
00:25:13.839 --> 00:25:16.440
three hundred and forty three dollars, her bad timing was

511
00:25:16.480 --> 00:25:19.759
still tremendously successful because of the simple power of compounding.

512
00:25:20.240 --> 00:25:22.119
She got her money into the market, and despite the

513
00:25:22.119 --> 00:25:24.160
immediate drops, it had twenty years to grow.

514
00:25:24.440 --> 00:25:26.880
Okay, Now for the critical punchline of this whole study,

515
00:25:27.200 --> 00:25:30.039
this is why procrastination is the true deadly threat to

516
00:25:30.079 --> 00:25:32.119
long term wealth. Tell Us about Larry Linger.

517
00:25:32.359 --> 00:25:35.480
Larry Linger is the investor paralyzed by fear. He's the

518
00:25:35.480 --> 00:25:37.759
one who was always convinced that lower stock prices were

519
00:25:37.799 --> 00:25:40.240
just around the corner, so he spent two decades waiting

520
00:25:40.240 --> 00:25:41.079
for the perfect time.

521
00:25:41.240 --> 00:25:43.119
He never invested in stocks at all.

522
00:25:43.400 --> 00:25:46.839
Never he left his money in cash investments, using treasury

523
00:25:46.880 --> 00:25:50.839
bills as a proxy. Larry fared worst of all, accumulating

524
00:25:50.839 --> 00:25:54.440
only forty seven thousand, three hundred and fifty seven dollars.

525
00:25:54.279 --> 00:25:58.839
Forty seven thousand. That is a staggering figure. So Rosie Rotten,

526
00:25:58.880 --> 00:26:01.400
the investor who always bought it the peak, still beat

527
00:26:01.480 --> 00:26:06.200
Larry Linger, the cautious procrastinator, by over one hundred thousand dollars.

528
00:26:06.519 --> 00:26:09.920
Over one hundred thousand dollars. That is life changing capital.

529
00:26:09.960 --> 00:26:10.839
That's the whole ballgame.

530
00:26:11.079 --> 00:26:14.119
It is the crucial takeaway that just defeats the fear narrative.

531
00:26:15.119 --> 00:26:18.920
Procrastination being Larry Linger was far far worse than having

532
00:26:19.000 --> 00:26:22.839
perpetually bad luck like Rosie Rotten. Larry sacrificed over one

533
00:26:22.880 --> 00:26:25.400
hundred and three thousand dollars compared to even the worst

534
00:26:25.440 --> 00:26:26.160
market timer.

535
00:26:26.319 --> 00:26:28.680
The study proves it the cost of waiting for that

536
00:26:28.720 --> 00:26:31.440
perfect moment which is driven by that primal fear of

537
00:26:31.519 --> 00:26:34.839
losing capital. It typically exceeds the benefit of even perfect timing.

538
00:26:35.079 --> 00:26:37.240
The best strategy is just to define your plan and

539
00:26:37.279 --> 00:26:40.079
execute it as soon as humanly possible, accepting the risk

540
00:26:40.079 --> 00:26:41.240
of short term volatility.

541
00:26:41.440 --> 00:26:45.240
If that quantitative evidence isn't enough to calm the evolutionary fear,

542
00:26:45.960 --> 00:26:48.240
we have to talk about the external noise that makes

543
00:26:48.240 --> 00:26:52.279
people procrastinate or panic in the first place. The financial media. Yes,

544
00:26:52.480 --> 00:26:57.400
the sources dive into how media sensationalism just exacerbates fear

545
00:26:57.440 --> 00:27:01.799
and misjudgment, turning every downturn into a potential crisis and

546
00:27:01.960 --> 00:27:05.079
every stock tip into a must buy opportunity.

547
00:27:05.359 --> 00:27:08.279
Absolutely, we have to see the business press not as

548
00:27:08.279 --> 00:27:11.359
a neutral party, but as an active market player that's

549
00:27:11.440 --> 00:27:15.400
driven by a profit motive. News organizations compete fiercely for

550
00:27:15.480 --> 00:27:19.160
our eyeballs, for clicks, and that incentivizes them to publish

551
00:27:19.279 --> 00:27:20.640
sensational news.

552
00:27:20.359 --> 00:27:23.759
Stories that are attention grabbing, speculative, and have broad appeal.

553
00:27:23.839 --> 00:27:26.799
And that commercial incentive often works directly against your need

554
00:27:26.839 --> 00:27:30.160
as an investor for patient, accurate, long term information.

555
00:27:30.359 --> 00:27:32.519
And we have hard data on how accurate those sensational

556
00:27:32.559 --> 00:27:35.920
stories actually are. Specifically, in the context of merger rumors,

557
00:27:36.000 --> 00:27:39.160
which are inherently dramatic and attention grabbing. Let's talk about

558
00:27:39.200 --> 00:27:40.640
the Ahern and Sosira study.

559
00:27:40.880 --> 00:27:43.839
This was a novel data set on merger rumors, and

560
00:27:43.920 --> 00:27:47.319
it found that investors often overreact to the average rumor.

561
00:27:47.920 --> 00:27:51.440
When a rumor breaks, the target company stock price just

562
00:27:51.559 --> 00:27:52.759
spikes dramatically.

563
00:27:52.880 --> 00:27:53.759
But then what happens.

564
00:27:54.160 --> 00:27:56.799
It's often followed by a significant reversal in the following

565
00:27:56.880 --> 00:28:01.559
days or weeks. This behavioral pattern suggests that investors, particularly

566
00:28:01.640 --> 00:28:05.400
the non institutional traders, they just can't perfectly distinguish the

567
00:28:05.519 --> 00:28:09.440
accurate rumors from the sheer noise. They react to the sizzle,

568
00:28:09.920 --> 00:28:10.640
not the stake.

569
00:28:11.119 --> 00:28:14.200
And here's the most counterintuitive finding for the average person

570
00:28:14.480 --> 00:28:17.720
who assumes the biggest story is the most reliable one.

571
00:28:17.799 --> 00:28:20.839
The most newsworthy targets were significantly less likely to have

572
00:28:20.920 --> 00:28:21.759
accurate rumors.

573
00:28:21.920 --> 00:28:24.759
That is the core finding that challenges our perception of

574
00:28:24.799 --> 00:28:30.640
financial reporting. The study defined newsworthy targets as large public

575
00:28:30.680 --> 00:28:35.039
firms with highly recognizable brands, you know, high corporate ad spending.

576
00:28:34.799 --> 00:28:36.640
The household names, the household names.

577
00:28:37.119 --> 00:28:41.039
Rumors about these firms are significantly less likely to come true. Overall,

578
00:28:41.119 --> 00:28:43.200
only thirty three percent of the rumors in the study

579
00:28:43.200 --> 00:28:46.599
were accurate, meaning a takeover bid actually materialized within.

580
00:28:46.440 --> 00:28:48.440
One year, so only one in three were real.

581
00:28:48.759 --> 00:28:52.160
And the media favors covering these prominent, well known firms

582
00:28:52.759 --> 00:28:56.200
even if the reporting quality or accuracy is lower, just

583
00:28:56.240 --> 00:28:58.160
because those names generate the most traffic.

584
00:28:58.359 --> 00:29:01.680
So the biggest, flashiest had about the most famous companies,

585
00:29:02.200 --> 00:29:04.559
the ones that trigger the highest emotional response and the

586
00:29:04.599 --> 00:29:08.799
most conversation are statistically the ones we should trust the least.

587
00:29:09.279 --> 00:29:12.680
That is a direct conflict between the media's profit motive

588
00:29:13.119 --> 00:29:15.440
and your need for the truth as an investor.

589
00:29:15.640 --> 00:29:16.720
That's incredible.

590
00:29:17.119 --> 00:29:22.319
It is. And Furthermore, the study identified specific objective signals

591
00:29:22.599 --> 00:29:26.920
that investors consistently overlooked, but that we're powerful predictors of

592
00:29:26.960 --> 00:29:30.000
whether a rumor was actually going to materialize. This is

593
00:29:30.039 --> 00:29:31.359
where you can gain an edge.

594
00:29:31.480 --> 00:29:34.599
Okay, let's detail these objective signals that investors fail to

595
00:29:34.599 --> 00:29:35.119
account for.

596
00:29:35.319 --> 00:29:39.440
First, journalists quality matters tremendously, but investors are terrible at

597
00:29:39.440 --> 00:29:42.920
pricing it in. A journalist is statistically more accurate if

598
00:29:42.920 --> 00:29:46.839
they're older, have an undergraduate degree in journalism, and specialize

599
00:29:46.880 --> 00:29:47.880
in the target's industry.

600
00:29:47.960 --> 00:29:49.920
So experience and specialization matter.

601
00:29:50.160 --> 00:29:54.799
They indicate better professional access and deeper institutional knowledge. And

602
00:29:54.920 --> 00:29:58.400
yet the average investor, driven by the sensational nature of

603
00:29:58.400 --> 00:30:02.000
the headline, doesn't seem to incorporate this quality metric into

604
00:30:02.000 --> 00:30:04.960
their trading decisions. They focus on what is said, not

605
00:30:05.079 --> 00:30:05.720
who set it.

606
00:30:06.359 --> 00:30:09.200
The market doesn't pause to check the reporter's resume. What

607
00:30:09.240 --> 00:30:11.880
about the language used in the article itself? That seems

608
00:30:11.880 --> 00:30:13.640
like something that should be easier to spot.

609
00:30:13.960 --> 00:30:18.400
Article language is another powerful signal that the unsophisticated investor overlooks.

610
00:30:19.400 --> 00:30:21.759
Accurate articles are found to be more likely to mention

611
00:30:21.880 --> 00:30:26.920
specific takeover prices, discuss potential bidders by name, and indicate

612
00:30:26.960 --> 00:30:30.759
that negotiations are in an advanced or late stage. This

613
00:30:30.839 --> 00:30:32.640
detail implies insider.

614
00:30:32.240 --> 00:30:34.000
Knowledge and the inaccurate ones.

615
00:30:34.359 --> 00:30:37.880
Conversely, articles that use an abundance of weak modal words

616
00:30:38.079 --> 00:30:43.279
like maybe, appears, could, conceivable reportedly, or a source suggests

617
00:30:43.680 --> 00:30:45.960
are significantly less likely to come true.

618
00:30:46.079 --> 00:30:49.480
So these hedging words are the journalist's legal defense mechanism,

619
00:30:49.559 --> 00:30:52.160
but for an investor they should be a massive red flag,

620
00:30:52.240 --> 00:30:53.960
indicating speculation not fact.

621
00:30:54.359 --> 00:30:57.680
Exactly, the text of these merger rumors was found to

622
00:30:57.720 --> 00:31:02.359
be much more speculative than official thingsancial disclosures. Paying attention

623
00:31:02.440 --> 00:31:05.319
to those hedging words is vital. It's the difference between

624
00:31:05.720 --> 00:31:09.599
the board appears to be considering a sale versus sources

625
00:31:09.640 --> 00:31:12.960
confirmed a fifty dollars per share bid was rejected last night.

626
00:31:13.200 --> 00:31:16.240
One is noise, the other is actionable.

627
00:31:15.759 --> 00:31:19.119
Detail precisely, and it sounds like investors are just overly

628
00:31:19.200 --> 00:31:22.400
influenced by the sensational source and the prominence of the firm,

629
00:31:22.920 --> 00:31:25.160
rather than the verifiable substance.

630
00:31:24.759 --> 00:31:27.000
Of the reporting, So they react strongly to signals that

631
00:31:27.039 --> 00:31:28.799
don't predict accuracy, like.

632
00:31:28.799 --> 00:31:32.359
Rumors from anonymous sources or just being featured in a big,

633
00:31:32.440 --> 00:31:35.720
high circulation newspaper. The stock returns on the day of

634
00:31:35.759 --> 00:31:38.759
publication were actually higher when the rumor came from an

635
00:31:38.759 --> 00:31:42.640
anonymous source, even though anonymity was statistically unrelated to the

636
00:31:42.680 --> 00:31:43.720
likelihood of accuracy.

637
00:31:43.799 --> 00:31:46.960
That's just wild. It confirms investors are driven by drama

638
00:31:47.039 --> 00:31:50.400
and narrative, not objective fact checking. And the trading data

639
00:31:50.400 --> 00:31:52.359
shows who is taking advantage of this noise.

640
00:31:52.599 --> 00:31:56.000
Oh yeah, it's the classic battle of retail versus institutions.

641
00:31:56.680 --> 00:32:00.319
The institutional trading data from Ancerno is very telling when

642
00:32:00.319 --> 00:32:04.680
a rumor breaks, total trading volumes spikes dramatically, and it's

643
00:32:04.759 --> 00:32:07.880
driven primarily by non incerno investors who are assumed to

644
00:32:07.880 --> 00:32:08.839
be retail traders.

645
00:32:09.119 --> 00:32:12.240
The average person reacting emotionally to the news, and.

646
00:32:12.200 --> 00:32:16.720
Crucially, institutional investors are consistently net sellers following the rumor

647
00:32:16.799 --> 00:32:18.119
publication Wow.

648
00:32:18.400 --> 00:32:22.480
So the institutional smart money is providing the shares to

649
00:32:22.559 --> 00:32:25.920
the eager, fear driven retail buyers who are reacting to

650
00:32:25.960 --> 00:32:26.960
the sensational news.

651
00:32:27.319 --> 00:32:30.440
The institutions are effectively selling their shares at an inflated

652
00:32:30.480 --> 00:32:33.240
price spike caused by the hype. They are taking the

653
00:32:33.279 --> 00:32:36.160
informed side of the trade, suggesting they're far better at

654
00:32:36.200 --> 00:32:39.319
analyzing the public information signals or lack thereof in the

655
00:32:39.359 --> 00:32:40.000
rumor article.

656
00:32:40.319 --> 00:32:43.839
They see the retail overreaction as a brief, profitable window

657
00:32:43.920 --> 00:32:45.400
to offload shares, and.

658
00:32:45.400 --> 00:32:49.480
The unsophisticated traders who are prone to overreacting to sensationalism,

659
00:32:49.799 --> 00:32:53.519
are buying based on hype, often buying high and then

660
00:32:53.559 --> 00:32:56.519
suffering when the stock price reverses, as the study showed

661
00:32:56.559 --> 00:32:59.880
it often does. The external noise of the media, fueled

662
00:33:00.039 --> 00:33:04.200
by its profit motive, creates distortions and the retail investor

663
00:33:04.279 --> 00:33:06.839
often pays the penalty for believing the hype.

664
00:33:06.880 --> 00:33:09.519
This has been a necessary deep dive into why we're

665
00:33:09.519 --> 00:33:14.680
basically wired to fail at investing. Our brains hate delayed gratification,

666
00:33:14.880 --> 00:33:18.559
they fear loss, and the media actively exploits those instincts.

667
00:33:19.000 --> 00:33:22.039
It's tough combination, but knowledge is only valuable if it

668
00:33:22.119 --> 00:33:25.400
leads to action. So let's turn these insights into concrete,

669
00:33:25.519 --> 00:33:29.240
actionable principles for overcoming our evolutionary handicaps and navigating all

670
00:33:29.240 --> 00:33:32.720
that noise. This is part four Strategies for long term success.

671
00:33:32.720 --> 00:33:33.920
What is strategy number one?

672
00:33:33.960 --> 00:33:38.480
Strategy one diversification and protection against permanent capital loss. We

673
00:33:38.599 --> 00:33:42.000
spend a lot of time distinguishing volatility from permanent capital laws.

674
00:33:42.400 --> 00:33:46.440
Diversification is your primary defense against that permanent, wilt destroying loss.

675
00:33:46.559 --> 00:33:49.039
It's the only free lunch and finance, they say.

676
00:33:49.039 --> 00:33:53.920
It really is. By spreading your investments across asset classes, stocks, bonds,

677
00:33:54.000 --> 00:33:57.839
real estate, and across different sectors and geographies, you eliminate

678
00:33:58.160 --> 00:34:01.720
or drastically mitigate that idiosyncratic risk.

679
00:34:01.759 --> 00:34:04.839
The risk that one bad company or one regional downturn

680
00:34:04.920 --> 00:34:05.920
can just wipe.

681
00:34:05.599 --> 00:34:09.360
You out exactly. Diversification ensures you're relying on the market's

682
00:34:09.400 --> 00:34:12.880
eventual upward trajectory, not the success of any single bet.

683
00:34:13.239 --> 00:34:16.599
It makes your portfolio resilient enough to survive the inevitable crashes.

684
00:34:16.760 --> 00:34:20.679
Okay, strategy too. This one addresses a practical factor that

685
00:34:20.719 --> 00:34:23.639
erodes returns no matter what your psychological state is, and

686
00:34:23.679 --> 00:34:25.920
it's one that is one hundred percent within your control.

687
00:34:26.000 --> 00:34:29.719
Strategy too, the power of low costs. We have powerful

688
00:34:29.800 --> 00:34:34.760
data from Vanguard showing that costs, specifically expense ratios, significantly

689
00:34:34.800 --> 00:34:37.519
impact your long term returns, often far more than small

690
00:34:37.559 --> 00:34:40.280
differences in investment skill or strategy over time.

691
00:34:40.480 --> 00:34:43.920
High expenses compound into these enormous losses and potential wealth.

692
00:34:44.039 --> 00:34:46.960
Think of fees as a persistent, invisible slow leak in

693
00:34:47.000 --> 00:34:48.039
your financial foundation.

694
00:34:48.280 --> 00:34:51.119
Let's use the specific hypothetical from the Vanguard data, because

695
00:34:51.119 --> 00:34:54.800
the numbers are just shocking. One hundred thousand dollars initial balance,

696
00:34:54.880 --> 00:34:59.119
earning a modest six percent per year reinvested over thirty years.

697
00:34:59.239 --> 00:35:02.679
Okay, in the lowest cost scenario using an index fund

698
00:35:02.679 --> 00:35:07.199
with a strategy three dollar cost averaging DCA. This is

699
00:35:07.280 --> 00:35:11.000
just investing a fixed amount of money regularly, weekly, monthly, whatever,

700
00:35:11.400 --> 00:35:14.480
regardless of what the market is doing. This approach is

701
00:35:14.519 --> 00:35:18.039
a disciplined way to prevent procrastination and eliminate the stress

702
00:35:18.039 --> 00:35:18.880
of market timing.

703
00:35:19.000 --> 00:35:21.719
As the Schwab study showed, trying to time the market

704
00:35:21.760 --> 00:35:24.440
is pointless, but waiting on the sidelines is catastrophic.

705
00:35:24.599 --> 00:35:29.159
Exactly, DCA forces consistency, which is the simple but hard

706
00:35:29.320 --> 00:35:30.480
ingredient for success.

707
00:35:30.599 --> 00:35:33.920
It seems like DCA is a brilliant behavioral compromise that

708
00:35:34.000 --> 00:35:36.079
directly counteracts our primal flaws.

709
00:35:36.159 --> 00:35:39.079
It absolutely is. It fights that present bias because you

710
00:35:39.159 --> 00:35:42.639
automate the investing decision, so the saving happens before you

711
00:35:42.679 --> 00:35:44.559
even have a chance to spend the cash.

712
00:35:44.239 --> 00:35:45.320
And it helps with the fear.

713
00:35:45.760 --> 00:35:49.519
Crucially, it minimizes the potential for loss of version and regret.

714
00:35:50.000 --> 00:35:52.679
If you invest a huge lump sum and the market

715
00:35:52.760 --> 00:35:57.119
immediately drops ten percent, that single sharp loss triggers intense

716
00:35:57.159 --> 00:35:59.480
regret and fear. It can cause you to panic and

717
00:35:59.519 --> 00:36:04.000
abandon your strategy. But by investing smaller amounts frequently, you're

718
00:36:04.039 --> 00:36:07.440
making multiple smaller investments, none of them are large enough

719
00:36:07.480 --> 00:36:10.119
to cause extreme regret if they suffer a short term drop.

720
00:36:10.679 --> 00:36:15.960
It converts one major scary decision into many small, manageable ones.

721
00:36:16.280 --> 00:36:16.599
Okay.

722
00:36:16.599 --> 00:36:19.360
Finally, let's wrap up with the direct countermeasures we can

723
00:36:19.440 --> 00:36:23.119
use to fight that prehistoric fear based programming when the

724
00:36:23.159 --> 00:36:27.320
market inevitably turns red. What are the key behavioral countermeasures

725
00:36:27.320 --> 00:36:28.320
we can implement today.

726
00:36:28.800 --> 00:36:32.719
First, develop a practice pause ritual. When the market is

727
00:36:32.840 --> 00:36:36.639
volatile and your instincts are screaming sell or run, you

728
00:36:36.719 --> 00:36:39.039
have to create distance between the emotion and the action.

729
00:36:39.360 --> 00:36:40.000
How do you do that?

730
00:36:40.119 --> 00:36:42.280
Step away from the screen for twenty four hours, Just

731
00:36:42.679 --> 00:36:45.599
walk away. Then, when you come back, look at your

732
00:36:45.599 --> 00:36:49.079
situation from a third party rational perspective. Ask yourself the

733
00:36:49.079 --> 00:36:51.960
critical question, what would I advise a friend to do

734
00:36:52.039 --> 00:36:54.360
if they had my same long term goal and my

735
00:36:54.480 --> 00:36:56.000
same diversified portfolio.

736
00:36:56.079 --> 00:36:59.039
You're forcing yourself to engage the rational, long term brain

737
00:36:59.320 --> 00:37:03.239
over the emotional, fear based brain. You're intentionally overriding that

738
00:37:03.280 --> 00:37:05.119
two hundred thousand year old software.

739
00:37:05.280 --> 00:37:09.320
Precisely and related to that is ensuring your real life

740
00:37:09.360 --> 00:37:14.119
security is separated from your market investments. This is maintain

741
00:37:14.159 --> 00:37:14.960
a safety.

742
00:37:14.599 --> 00:37:16.079
Harness your emergency fund.

743
00:37:16.119 --> 00:37:18.840
Your emergency fund you have to keep enough cash reserves

744
00:37:19.079 --> 00:37:22.760
typically six months of living expenses, in highly liquid, safe

745
00:37:22.800 --> 00:37:25.679
assets outside of the market. This serves a dual purpose.

746
00:37:25.800 --> 00:37:26.679
Okay, what are they?

747
00:37:26.960 --> 00:37:29.519
First, it ensures that you are never forced to sell

748
00:37:29.559 --> 00:37:32.920
your investments during a market downturn to cover an emergency.

749
00:37:33.079 --> 00:37:36.960
A forced sale locks in a loss caused by volatility. Second,

750
00:37:37.280 --> 00:37:41.079
it drastically reduces the emotional pressure. If you know your

751
00:37:41.079 --> 00:37:44.159
family's immediate needs are covered, you can comfortably allow your

752
00:37:44.199 --> 00:37:47.159
long term portfolio to write out the storm. You know

753
00:37:47.239 --> 00:37:50.360
that the red numbers on the screen are just temporary volatility,

754
00:37:50.719 --> 00:37:52.079
not a threat to your survival.

755
00:37:52.480 --> 00:37:54.880
So if we strip away all the noise and all

756
00:37:54.880 --> 00:37:57.039
the fear. The crux of the matter is that investment

757
00:37:57.119 --> 00:38:00.880
success really boils down to two simple but incredibly difficult things,

758
00:38:01.360 --> 00:38:02.639
discipline and patience.

759
00:38:02.960 --> 00:38:07.079
It really does discipline to invest consistently, to use dollar

760
00:38:07.119 --> 00:38:10.920
cost averaging and to manage your costs, and patience to

761
00:38:11.000 --> 00:38:14.559
resist that evolutionary urge to panic during volatility, and to

762
00:38:14.599 --> 00:38:18.239
ignore the sensational media that profits from that panic. Sticking

763
00:38:18.280 --> 00:38:22.159
to a low cost, well researched, diversified plan it typically

764
00:38:22.239 --> 00:38:25.760
yields far better long term results than relying on intuition

765
00:38:25.960 --> 00:38:28.280
or gut feelings about timing or stock picking.

766
00:38:28.559 --> 00:38:31.079
You have to decide to trust the data over your dread.

767
00:38:31.199 --> 00:38:32.079
That's it exactly.

768
00:38:32.320 --> 00:38:34.320
So this deep dive has shown us that the risk

769
00:38:34.360 --> 00:38:37.480
in investing is less about the inherent market structure, which

770
00:38:37.599 --> 00:38:41.079
over decades favors consistent growth, and far more about our

771
00:38:41.119 --> 00:38:44.719
own evolutionary tendency toward panic and our susceptibility to that

772
00:38:44.840 --> 00:38:46.039
external media noise.

773
00:38:46.239 --> 00:38:49.039
The fear that prevents people from investing is self generated.

774
00:38:49.280 --> 00:38:51.920
And if there is one quantitative finding to remember from

775
00:38:51.920 --> 00:38:54.280
all of this, it's the most counterintuitive finding from that

776
00:38:54.320 --> 00:38:58.480
Schwab study. Bad timing is still drastically better than procrastination.

777
00:38:58.920 --> 00:39:02.280
Rosie Rotten, the worst timer, beat Larry Linger, the cautious waiter,

778
00:39:02.440 --> 00:39:05.800
by over one hundred thousand dollars. We have to fight

779
00:39:05.880 --> 00:39:08.840
that primal urge to wait or to run. The action

780
00:39:08.920 --> 00:39:12.760
of investing, even if it's poorly executed, far outweighs the

781
00:39:12.800 --> 00:39:14.239
inaction driven by fear.

782
00:39:14.639 --> 00:39:17.360
So we'll leave you with this final provocative thought. It

783
00:39:17.440 --> 00:39:20.480
draws on the concept of the unlived life or future

784
00:39:20.559 --> 00:39:24.639
life regret that stems from financial inaction. Given the overwhelming

785
00:39:24.639 --> 00:39:29.039
evidence that investing immediately, even with terrible timing, consistently beats

786
00:39:29.039 --> 00:39:32.800
staying on the sidelines, consider this question, if investing is

787
00:39:32.840 --> 00:39:36.519
mechanically simple, and the long term risk is low. What small,

788
00:39:36.599 --> 00:39:39.719
simple investment decision are you postponing today that could compound

789
00:39:39.760 --> 00:39:43.079
into a massive lost opportunity years from now. Don't let

790
00:39:43.079 --> 00:39:45.119
the fear of a lion on the screen dictate the

791
00:39:45.199 --> 00:39:46.880
terms of your future financial freedom.

792
00:39:47.239 --> 00:39:50.920
Thanks for listening to Smart Money Explained. If you found

793
00:39:50.920 --> 00:39:54.079
this episode helpful, follow the show so you don't miss

794
00:39:54.119 --> 00:39:58.440
future episodes covering investing, markets, and personal finance.

795
00:39:59.039 --> 00:40:02.800
This podcast is for educational purposes only and does not

796
00:40:03.039 --> 00:40:04.840
constitute financial advice.

797
00:40:05.679 --> 00:40:07.639
We'll see you in the next episode.